A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed into a very publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design works at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family dwelling. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-large h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court René Collier heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.