A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly inside a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially created, is in the correct placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their watch, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, an image that has since develop into emblematic of the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they ended up meant to Get visual evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning became Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the lawful timeline.
At the Main of the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and ailments attached to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal check out, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply just attempting to build a family members residence in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Unique Area of Conservation and say that all operates have already been carried out based upon Qualified guidance and permitted programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea all through a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site case has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for any condition a large number of observers see as more and more popular. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Beforehand been linked to area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from extremely diverse professional backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-significant water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily fact from the coastline as well as symbolic character of the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive tactic.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the result continues to be uncertain. The court docket should establish whether or not the wall as built complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to live together with one another extensive following the lawful expenditures are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties which include environmental security and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of normal magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre with the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal thoughts. Irrespective of whether it can in the long run be altered, eliminated, or done as planned will rely upon the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will very likely continue to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.